Top Five Movies That Are Better Than The Book
It’s become an absolute cliche to say that the book is always better than the movie, but the Journal Pulp is about to let you in on a dirty little secret: it isn’t always so.
The following, composed in rather rapid fashion, is my off-the-cuff top-five list of movies that are better than the book:
Number 5: The English Patient, a well-written novel by Sri Lankan-Canadian writer Michael Ondaatje. The movie, directed by the English auteur Anthony Minghella (RIP), with phenomenal acting performances by Juliette Binoche, the stunning and skeletal Kristin Scott Thomas, and most especially Ralph Fiennes, concretizes in ways the novel does not approach this complicated plot.
Number 4: The Grifters, by Big Jim Thompson (1906 — 1977), who was a prolific and good (if uneven) pulp writer. The movie came out in 1990 and is a kind of neo-noir film, directed by another English auteur named Stephen Frears, produced by Martin Scorsese. Anjelica Huston and Annette Bening deliver unforgettable performances (“So what’s it going to be? The lady, or the loot?”), but the undisputed star of this show is John Cusack, who plays the cool and tragic Roy Dillon.
Number 3: Wild At Heart, by Barry Gifford, whom I admit to having a true literary affection for — though I’m not entirely sure why: he writes so much mediocre stuff. And yet there’s something about him, something unlike anyone else. I did genuinely like his slim novel Wild At Heart and I recommend it for the writing style alone. In fact, it’s among his very best efforts and the writing is truly beautiful. But it doesn’t compare to the movie, directed by none other than David Lynch, and 1990 winner of the coveted Palm D’Or at Cannes — a flawed movie, to be sure (all Wizard of Oz references should have been removed), but a movie that is not unintelligible, as so many David Lynch movies are, a gorgeous movie with profundity and strangeness and seriousness and laugh-out-loud humor, all at the same time. Sailor Ripley, incidentally, the main character, is one of my favorite movie characters of all-time.
Number 2: After Dark, My Sweet, which was also written by the previously mentioned pulp writer Jim Thompson, a book told from the first-person perspective, as most of Jim Thompson’s novels are, and in this case that first-person perspective flaws it, in my opinion. But I did like the book. The movie, however, directed by James Foley and starring Jason Patrick and the very lovely Rachel Ward (who never looked lovelier), is filmed with a sparseness and sense of longing that takes the story to a level far beyond noir. This is one of the most romantic movies ever, with a heartbreaking ending you will not see coming.
Number 1: Blade Runner, of course. Of course. A semi-famous novel, first published in 1968, entitled Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by American writer Philip K. Dick, who is a good writer, though you wouldn’t necessarily know it from this book alone. The movie Blade Runner (directed by the vastly overrated Ridley Scot) is not only better: it’s better by light years. In fact, Blade Runner is bottomless, and without any doubt one of the greatest movie ever made.
Share this:
Written by journalpulp
April 12, 2012 at 9:20 pm
Posted in Movies
Tagged with After Dark My Sweet, Barry Gifford, Blade Runner, Bruce Dern, David Lynch, directed by the English auteur Anthony Minghella, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, English Patient, Jason Patrick, Jim Thompson, Kristin Scott Thomas, Laura Dern, lulu, movie better than book, Philip K. Dick, Rachel Ward, Ralph Fiennes Juliette Binoche, Ridley Scot, Sailor Ripley, Sri Lankan-Canadian writer Michael Ondaatje. The movie, Stephen Frears, The Grifters, Wild At Heart, Wizard of Oz
19 Responses
Subscribe to comments with RSS.





I loved Blade Runner! I never read the book, but will take your word for it. Enjoy the sunshine while it lasts!
susielindau
April 12, 2012 at 11:24 pm
Blade Runner: best movie ever.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Mediocre. You can easily go your whole life without having read it.
Just incidentally, this same Philip K. Dick wrote a short story called “We Can Remember It for You Wholesale” upon which the movie Total Recall is based. I liked Total Recall and would have included that on this list, were it not for the fact that it wasn’t first a book but a short story.
Thank you for dropping by, Susie. I hope your birthday was one for the books.
journalpulp
April 13, 2012 at 7:29 pm
Thanks Pulpman!
I also loved The Lord of the Rings series equally. Both the books and the movies rocked!
susielindau
April 13, 2012 at 7:49 pm
No movie with Cage can be better than the book! and I would add “No Country for Old Men,” however, they are more-or-less one in the same.
S.W. May
April 13, 2012 at 2:43 am
I’m not a Nick Cage fan, just for the record here. I used to kind of like him, when he (and I) were younger — Vampire’s Kiss, Valley Girl, and Wild At Heart — but in my opinion he lost his edge long ago.
More important, I forgot about No Country for Old Men, and I agree with you completely that the movie was better than the book — far better, actually, though I didn’t love either. I thought the book, which started out okay, ground to halt. By the end, I didn’t care. I thought Cormac really dropped the ball with his protagonist, Moss. He could have at least had him put up a semi-decent fight….
journalpulp
April 13, 2012 at 7:41 pm
While you might be horrified to hear that I haven’t seen ANY of these movies OR read any of the books (eep, that is scary), I LOVE this post! It’s definitely a topic that’s been on my mind a lot lately, having just seen The Hunger Games!
gojulesgo
April 13, 2012 at 2:19 pm
Julie, Julie, please. You of all people could never horrify me — especially not after everything we’ve been through. I do so appreciate you taking time out from your avalanche of comments to flatter me, to read my scribbles. Here’s to turning misfortune into fortune.
Thank you for dropping by.
journalpulp
April 13, 2012 at 8:08 pm
Woah, Grifters is a book? I had no idea. Glad I started with the movie.
I’d add Hannibal, though I dug the book. The movie’s ending blew the book’s out of the water.
August McLaughlin
April 13, 2012 at 4:41 pm
Hi August. Yes, the Grifters is a book, and it’s a pretty good book. In fact, it’s my favorite novel of Jim Thompson’s — and that’s saying quite a bit since he wrote so many, and since I like several. I never read Hannibal, but coincidentally enough I did consider putting Silence of the Lambs on this list. Clarice is one of my very favorite female characters in all movie history, and, truth be told, the only reason I didn’t put it on the list is that I didn’t finish the book. How’s that for lame?
It’s very good to see you. Thank you for dropping by.
journalpulp
April 13, 2012 at 8:14 pm
Two bullseyes there, Ray. One for Blade Runner and one for The English Patient. Blade Runner is quite a different beast from the story that inspired it, but The English Patient is a masterful and slick retelling, which makes the novel look sprawling. And not many people dare to say that, so I raise a murky cocktail to you for that.
rozmorris @dirtywhitecandy
April 15, 2012 at 1:00 pm
Another murky cocktail! My dear Ms. Morris, you’re going to get me all fucked-up.
But seriously speaking, I’m glad you agree with me about The English Patient. As you point out, few people do. I did like the book okay and thought the biggest difference was in the way Michael Ondaatje developed the characters of Kip and Hannah, who in my mind become the focal point of Ondaatje’s story, though not so in the movie — which from my perspective was one of the many things that made the movie better: the development of Katherine Clifton and Count Almásy. I thought that relationship (to the credit of Kristin Scott Thomas, Ralph Fiennes, and Anthony Minghella) was absolutely riveting, real, and poignant. And I agree with you that the novel is sprawling and loose. There was something about that movie that capitivated me.
journalpulp
April 15, 2012 at 8:34 pm
I’m a little late getting to this…was trying to think of any other film adaptations where I liked the movie better. Because I’m all girly and stuff I would have to add Gone With the Wind. Though I loved Margaret Mitchell’s epic prose saga, I thought the casting of GWTW was so spot on (including the hot chemistry between Vivian Leigh and Clark Gable) that it carried the story even beyond the book’s ability to convey the broader sociological themes. Another girly add on is the 1995 version of Jane Austen’s somewhat inaccessible Sense and Sensibility. Emma Thompson’s screenplay was subtle and witty (for which she won an Oscar), set decoration and costuming devine, and the acting was understated yet full of emotion.
Oh, and Blade Runner: Best Movie EVER!
Kecia Adams
April 20, 2012 at 6:40 pm
I admit it: I’ve never read Gone With The Wind. But did you know that it was one of Ayn Rand’s favorite novels? I’m not sure why that strikes me as odd, but it definitely does.
And Sense and Sensibility ISN’T girly, girly.
Jeff here suggested The Borne Identity, and I most emphatically agree with that.
Blade Runner: Best Movie EVAR! (Okay, maybe Miller’s Crossing. And Barton Fink.)
journalpulp
April 20, 2012 at 8:11 pm
Ahhhh…. Wild At Heart…. I LOVE that movie. I miss Nicolas Cage’s “cult classic” quality that he used to bring to his films. Who can forget Raising Arizona? What happened to him?
While I have not read these books, I have read many where I thought that the movie adaptation was admirable in light of the time restraints inflicted in film. The Color Purple, for instance, was just as brilliant in the film version as it was in the book, as was Silence of the Lambs. But I am a visual person, so I’m easily swayed.
cornfedgirl
April 24, 2012 at 10:08 pm
cornfedgirl, what a pleasant surprise. Thank you for dropping by. In addition to being a visual person easily swayed, you’re a woman after my own heart in other ways. I think Wild at Heart divides people more than any other movie I know. At least half whom I’ve recommended it to hate it. The other half love it. And what did happen to Nicolas Cage? I really don’t know. I’m embarrassed to admit it, but I somehow forgot about him in Raising Arizona, until I read your comment. He was by far the best thing about that movie — and that’s saying quite a bit.
Would you, by the way, believe me if I told you that my latest post was partly inspired by you?
journalpulp
April 24, 2012 at 10:57 pm
I always wanted to add ‘Muse’ to my resume….
cornfedgirl
April 25, 2012 at 3:00 pm
Qualifications:
Literate, honest, corn fed, dairy fed, muse …
Yes, that has a certain ring to it.
journalpulp
April 25, 2012 at 7:38 pm
You should see me with a baton.
cornfedgirl
April 26, 2012 at 12:36 am
Now you’re talking my language.
journalpulp
April 26, 2012 at 7:43 am